As even the most casual reader of this here Livejournal will tell you, I grew up in New England and have a particular fondness for it, and by fondness I mean I tend to show blatant favoritism towards the region (particularly the Great State of Rhode Island... minus its useless Governor). That said, there are times when even that most enlightened of American regions can have its head so far up its ass that even I get fed up with it.
Even now, in the face of overwhelming evidence, New England's fisheries are defiantly, staunchly,
blatantly ignorant. And fiercely proud of it.
Having worked in fisheries management, I've seen firsthand how personally offended New England fishermen can get when someone attempts to regulate the fishery. There is also a culture of "blame the agency" that is especially prevalent there as well; most commercial fishermen in New England like to think that NMFS should make all the decisions, so when something doesn't work (usually because of action by the fishermen themselves) it automatically becomes the fault of the regulators.
Some of this may be from a cultural and historical point of view. The New England cod fishery was one of the original industries of the American colonies and a large part of the economic independence they developed from Mother Britain (which would later lead to actual independence). However, the cod fishery failed due in no small part to the fact that both Canadian and American agencies believed in the inexhaustability of the ocean and actually told fishermen to keep fishing despite all evidence that a collapse was eminent. At the time, fishermen were actually calling for regulation and protection of the stocks. Now, the situation is reversed.
The sad part is, nearly every other region has learned from the downfall of the New England fishery, complying with NMFS regulations for the benefit of the greater health of the fishery. New England fishermen should be the
first to accept regulations backed up by sound science because they are
the fishery that initially
created the need for such regulations. Instead, they continue to fight tooth and nail against any regulation
at all that prevents them from following the practices that wiped out their livelihood. They would much rather just keep strip-mining George's Bank in the blissful fallacy that "the cod/flounder/hake/dogfish/herring will be back next year."
Now, I am not anti-fisherman. I fully believe that fishing is an important part of both the culture and economy of New England. And I've met several fishermen who know that drastic regulatory measures need to be taken to preserve the resource (and their jobs). Also, some blame does go on NMFS for being unnecessarily soft on New England fishermen (hopefully Jane Lubchenco, known for being a hard-ass when it comes to standing up to fishing interests, will change this).
The regulations that New England fishermen fear so much have far from wiped out commercial fishing in just about every other major fishing region in the US. Alaska may have the single most-regulated fishery on the planet (certainly the country) and still manages to churn out enough salmon, pollock, and snow crab to be one of the main economic drivers of the state. The time has come to
wake up, New England. Your fishery is acting like a small child with a cold who would rather suffer with the virus because the cough medicine "tastes icky."
As a side-note, anyone wondering where I picked up the little historical tidbits about the New England cod fishery should check out Mark Kurlansky's book
Cod, which traces the cultural significance of the cod fishery and how it has, in fact, changed the world on several occasions. It's a damn good read.